Table of Contents

Index to Financial Statements

As filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 7, 2007

Registration No. 333-139572

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

Amendment No. 4

to

Form S-1

REGISTRATION STATEMENT

UNDER THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933

CHENIERE ENERGY PARTNERS, L.P.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

717 Texas Avenue, Suite 3100

Houston, Texas 77002

(713) 659-1361

(Address, including zip code, and telephone number, including area code, of registrant’s principal executive offices)

Don A. Turkleson

Chief Financial Officer

717 Texas Avenue, Suite 3100

Houston, Texas 77002

(713) 659-1361

(Name, address, including zip code, and telephone number including area code, of agent for service)

Copies to:

Approximate date of commencement of proposed sale to the public:    As soon as practicable after this Registration Statement becomes effective.

If any of the securities being registered on this Form are to be offered on a delayed or continuous basis pursuant to Rule 415 under the Securities Act of 1933, check the following box.  ¨

If this Form is filed to register additional securities for an offering pursuant to Rule 462(b) under the Securities Act, please check the following box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of the earlier effective registration statement for the same offering.  ¨

If this Form is a post-effective amendment filed pursuant to Rule 462(c) under the Securities Act, check the following box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of the earlier effective registration statement for the same offering.  ¨

If this Form is a post-effective amendment filed pursuant to Rule 462(d) under the Securities Act, check the following box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of the earlier effective registration statement for the same offering.  ¨

The Registrant hereby amends this Registration Statement on such date or dates as may be necessary to delay its effective date until the Registrant shall file a further amendment which specifically states that this Registration Statement shall thereafter become effective in accordance with Section 8(a) of the Securities Act of 1933 or until the Registration Statement shall become effective on such date as the Securities and Exchange Commission, acting pursuant to said Section 8(a), may determine.

Table of Contents

Index to Financial Statements

The information in this prospectus is not complete and may be changed. We may not sell these securities until the registration statement filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission is effective. This prospectus is not an offer to sell these securities and is not soliciting an offer to buy these securities in any state where the offer or sale is not permitted.

SUBJECT TO COMPLETION, DATED MARCH 7, 2007

P R O S P E C T U S

12,500,000 Common Units

Representing Limited Partner Interests

Cheniere Energy Partners, L.P.

$          per unit

We are a limited partnership recently formed by Cheniere Energy, Inc., or Cheniere. This is the initial public offering of our common units. This prospectus relates to an estimated 5,223,703 common units to be offered by us and an estimated 7,276,297 common units to be offered by Cheniere LNG Holdings, LLC, an affiliate of Cheniere. The allocation of the common units to be sold in this offering between us and the selling unitholder will vary based on the actual public offering price and our estimated cost to fund a distribution reserve. We expect the initial public offering price to be between $19.00 and $21.00 per unit. The selling unitholder has granted the underwriters a 30-day option to purchase up to an additional 1,875,000 common units to cover over-allotments. We will not receive any proceeds from any common units sold by the selling unitholder. Our common units have been approved for listing on the American Stock Exchange under the symbol “CQP.”

We will establish a distribution reserve with the net proceeds that we receive from this offering, which will be used to fund the payment of the initial quarterly distribution of $0.425 per unit on all common units, as well as related distributions to our general partner, through the quarter ending June 30, 2009.

Investing in our common units involves risks. Please read “ Risk Factors” beginning on page 19.

These risks include the following:

Neither the Securities and Exchange Commission nor any state securities commission has approved or disapproved of these securities or passed upon the adequacy or accuracy of this prospectus. Any representation to the contrary is a criminal offense.

The underwriters expect to deliver the common units on or about                     , 2007.

                    , 2007

Table of Contents

Index to Financial Statements

Table of Contents

Index to Financial Statements

You should rely only on the information contained in this prospectus. We have not, and the underwriters and selling unitholder have not, authorized anyone to provide you with different information. If anyone provides you with different or inconsistent information, you should not rely on it. We are not, and the underwriters and selling unitholder are not, making an offer to sell these securities in any jurisdiction where an offer or sale is not permitted. You should assume that the information appearing in this prospectus is accurate only as of the date on the front cover of this prospectus. Our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects may have changed since that date.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

i

Table of Contents

Index to Financial Statements

ii

Table of Contents

Index to Financial Statements

References in this prospectus to “Cheniere Energy Partners, L.P.,” “we,” “our,” “us” or like terms when used in a historical context refer to the business conducted by Sabine Pass LNG, L.P. and its general partner and limited partner, the equity interests of which are being contributed to Cheniere Energy Partners, L.P. in connection with this offering. When used in the present tense or prospectively, those terms refer to Cheniere Energy Partners, L.P. and its subsidiaries. References to “Cheniere” with respect to periods prior to the closing of this offering mean Cheniere Energy, Inc., together with its subsidiaries, as the historical owner and operator of our business, while those references with respect to periods from and after the closing of this offering mean Cheniere Energy, Inc., together with its subsidiaries, as the indirect owner of our general partner. References to “Sabine Pass LNG” refer to Sabine Pass LNG, L.P., our indirect wholly-owned subsidiary. References to the “selling unitholder” and “Cheniere Holdings” refer to Cheniere LNG Holdings, LLC, an indirect subsidiary of Cheniere and our sole limited partner prior to the closing of this offering.

United Kingdom

This document is an advertisement and not a prospectus approved by the Financial Services Authority. Copies of the prospectus will, following publication, be available from our registered office. Although it is intended that the prospectus will be approved by the Financial Services Authority as a prospectus prepared in accordance with the prospectus rules made under section 73A of the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000, this document has not been so approved. Similarly, although it is intended that the prospectus will be made available to the public in accordance with the prospectus rules, this document has not been made available in accordance therewith.

Other EEA member states

This document is an advertisement for purposes of applicable measures implementing the European Prospectus Directive. A prospectus prepared pursuant to European Prospectus Directive and applicable implementing measures will be published. Copies of the prospectus, following publication, will be available from Cheniere Energy Partners, L.P., 717 Texas Avenue, Suite 3100, Houston, Texas 77002.

iii

Table of Contents

Index to Financial Statements

SUMMARY

This summary highlights information contained elsewhere in this prospectus. It does not contain all of the information that you should consider before investing in the common units. You should read the entire prospectus carefully, including the historical financial statements and the notes to those financial statements. You should read “Risk Factors” for information about important risks to consider before buying our common units. Unless otherwise indicated, the information presented in this prospectus assumes an initial offering price per common unit of $20.00 and that the underwriters’ option to purchase additional units is not exercised.

Cheniere Energy Partners, L.P.

Overview

We are a Delaware limited partnership recently formed by Cheniere Energy, Inc. Through our wholly-owned subsidiary, Sabine Pass LNG, we will develop, own and operate the Sabine Pass LNG receiving terminal currently under construction in western Cameron Parish, Louisiana on the Sabine Pass Channel.

Construction of the Sabine Pass LNG receiving terminal began in March 2005. Upon completion of construction, the Sabine Pass LNG receiving terminal will be the largest LNG receiving terminal in North America with approximately 4.0 billion cubic feet per day, or Bcf/d, of regasification capacity and approximately 16.8 Bcf of LNG storage capacity. All of this capacity has been contracted for under three 20-year, firm commitment terminal use agreements, or TUAs. Each customer must make payments on a “take-or-pay” basis, which means that the customer will be obligated to pay the full contracted amount of monthly fees whether or not it uses any of its reserved capacity. Provided the Sabine Pass LNG receiving terminal has achieved the required level of commercial operation, which we expect will occur in the third quarter of 2008, these “take-or-pay” TUA payments will be made as follows:

The Sabine Pass LNG Receiving Terminal

The initial phase, or Phase 1, of the Sabine Pass LNG receiving terminal was designed, and permitted by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, or the FERC, with a regasification capacity of 2.6 Bcf/d, three LNG storage tanks with an aggregate LNG storage capacity of 10.1 billion cubic feet, or Bcf, and two unloading docks capable of handling the largest LNG carriers currently being operated or built. In July 2006, Sabine Pass LNG

1

Table of Contents

Index to Financial Statements

received approval from the FERC to increase the regasification capacity of the Sabine Pass LNG receiving terminal from 2.6 Bcf/d to 4.0 Bcf/d by adding up to three additional LNG storage tanks, additional vaporizers and related facilities. We refer to the entire FERC-approved expansion as Phase 2. The first stage of the Phase 2 expansion will include two additional LNG storage tanks, additional vaporizers and related facilities, and will achieve a full operability at approximately 4.0 Bcf/d and an aggregate storage capacity of approximately 16.8 Bcf. We refer to this expansion as Phase 2 – Stage 1. We will conduct further Phase 2 expansion, if any, including construction of a potential sixth LNG storage tank, in one or more subsequent stages.

The timeline below sets forth the anticipated timing for completing construction of Phase 1 and Phase 2 – Stage 1 of the Sabine Pass LNG receiving terminal and the timing of payments to Sabine Pass LNG under the TUAs.

We estimate that the cost to construct Phase 1 of the Sabine Pass LNG receiving terminal will be approximately $900 million to $950 million, before financing costs. We estimate that the cost to construct Phase 2 – Stage 1 will be approximately $500 million to $550 million, before financing costs. These cost estimates are subject to change due to such items as cost overruns, change orders, delays in construction, increased component and material costs, escalation of labor costs and increased spending to maintain the construction schedule. As of December 31, 2006, Sabine Pass LNG had paid $564.2 million and $44.0 million of Phase 1 and Phase 2 – Stage 1 construction costs, respectively. The remaining construction expenditures will be funded by Sabine Pass LNG from a construction account established in November 2006 with $886.7 million of the proceeds from the issuance of $2,032 million of its senior secured notes, which we refer to as the Sabine Pass LNG notes. Please read “Indebtedness” for more information about the Sabine Pass LNG notes and, among other things, the restricted payment requirements imposed on Sabine Pass LNG by the indenture governing the Sabine Pass LNG notes.

Business Objectives

Our primary business objectives are to complete construction of the Sabine Pass LNG receiving terminal and, thereafter, to generate stable cash flows sufficient to pay the initial quarterly distribution to our unitholders and, over time and upon satisfaction of these objectives, to increase our quarterly cash distribution.

Competitive Strengths

We believe that we have several strengths in pursuing our business objectives and strategies, including:

2

Table of Contents

Index to Financial Statements

Our Relationship with Cheniere

Cheniere is the indirect owner of our general partner, as well as of our common and subordinated units that will represent a 90.4% limited partner interest in us upon completion of this offering. Cheniere is engaged primarily in the business of developing onshore LNG receiving terminals, and related natural gas pipelines, along the Gulf Coast of the United States. Cheniere is also developing a business to market LNG and natural gas, primarily through Cheniere Marketing. To a limited extent, Cheniere is also engaged in oil and natural gas exploration and development activities in the Gulf of Mexico.

Cheniere Marketing has entered into a TUA for all of the regasification capacity at the Sabine Pass LNG receiving terminal not reserved and utilized by Total and Chevron. As a result, approximately 50% of our anticipated combined revenues will be attributable to fees paid by Cheniere Marketing under its TUA with Sabine Pass LNG, which will be guaranteed by Cheniere. Cheniere Marketing is a small, development stage company, with a limited operating history, limited capital, no credit rating and an unproven business strategy. Cheniere Marketing’s business plan is to purchase LNG on a short-term and long-term basis, to regasify the LNG at Sabine Pass LNG or other LNG receiving terminals, and to trade natural gas and market regasified LNG in North America and other worldwide natural gas markets. It intends to earn a profit on the purchase of LNG and sale of natural gas after paying its TUA and pipeline fees and other operating expenses. Cheniere Marketing has no agreements or arrangements for supplies of LNG, a limited history of trading natural gas and no unconditional commitments from customers for the purchase of natural gas.

In addition to the Sabine Pass LNG receiving terminal, Cheniere has two other LNG receiving terminals that are currently in early stages of development: the Corpus Christi LNG receiving terminal near Corpus Christi, Texas, and the Creole Trail LNG receiving terminal at the mouth of the Calcasieu Channel in central Cameron Parish, Louisiana. If constructed in accordance with the permits that have been issued by the FERC, these two terminals would have an aggregate designed regasification capacity of approximately 5.9 Bcf/d. Cheniere is also developing, and anticipates constructing, natural gas pipelines to connect each of the three LNG receiving terminals to North American natural gas markets.

In the future, we may have opportunities to acquire some or all of these assets from Cheniere at an appropriate stage of commercialization and development, although we cannot predict whether any acquisitions will be made available to us or whether we will pursue or complete any future acquisitions. Our relationship with Cheniere also provides us with access to Cheniere’s management talent, market insights and significant industry relationships. Although we believe that our relationship with Cheniere is a strength, it is also a source of conflicts of interest. Cheniere is not restricted from competing with us and is free to develop, operate and dispose of, and is currently developing, LNG receiving terminals, pipelines and other assets without any obligation to offer us the opportunity to develop or acquire those assets. Please read “Conflicts of Interest and Fiduciary Duties.”

3

Table of Contents

Index to Financial Statements

Independent Engineer’s Report

This prospectus contains a report by Stone & Webster Management Consultants, Inc., or the Independent Engineer. The Independent Engineer is a leading consulting and engineering firm that devotes a substantial portion of its resources to providing services related to the technical, environmental and economic aspects of industrial facilities. The Independent Engineer’s report analyzes certain construction, technical, environmental and economic aspects of the Sabine Pass LNG receiving terminal. This report includes, among other things, discussions of the technology used at the Sabine Pass LNG receiving terminal, engineering and construction execution issues and costs, operating plans, timing matters, environmental permitting status, and a technical review of the construction and related documents pertaining to the Sabine Pass LNG receiving terminal. A copy of the report is attached as Appendix B to this prospectus and should be read in its entirety.

In the preparation of its report, the Independent Engineer has relied on assumptions regarding circumstances beyond the control of us or any other person. By their nature, these assumptions are subject to significant uncertainties, and actual results will differ, perhaps materially, from those stated in the report. We cannot give any assurance that these assumptions will prove to be correct. If our actual results are materially less favorable than those shown in the Independent Engineer’s report, or if the assumptions prove to be incorrect, Sabine Pass LNG’s ability to pay distributions to us, and our ability to pay distributions to our unitholders, may be adversely affected.

Summary of Risk Factors

An investment in our common units involves risks associated with our business, our partnership structure and the tax characteristics of our common units. Those risks are described under the caption “Risk Factors” and include:

Risks Relating to Our Business in General

Risks Relating to Completion of the Sabine Pass LNG Receiving Terminal

4

Table of Contents

Index to Financial Statements

Risks Relating to Our Cash Distributions

Risks Relating to Development and Operation of Our Business

5

Table of Contents

Index to Financial Statements

Risks Relating to an Investment in Us and Our Common Units

Risks Relating to Tax Matters

Formation Transactions and Partnership Structure

General

We are a Delaware limited partnership formed in November 2006. At or before the closing of this offering, the following transactions will occur:

6

Table of Contents

Index to Financial Statements

The allocation of the common units to be sold in this offering between us and the selling unitholder will vary based on the actual public offering price and our estimated cost to fund the distribution reserve at the time we price the offering, which we currently believe will be approximately $96.9 million. Any net proceeds that we receive in excess of the amount necessary to fund the distribution reserve will be distributed to the selling unitholder, and any shortfall in that amount will be contributed to us by the selling unitholder.

As is common with publicly traded limited partnerships and in order to maximize operational flexibility, we will conduct our operations through subsidiaries.

7

Table of Contents

Index to Financial Statements

Organizational Structure

The following table and diagram depict our ownership and organizational structure, after giving effect to this offering and the related transactions, and our relationship with Cheniere and Cheniere Marketing.

8

Table of Contents

Index to Financial Statements

Management of Our Partnership

Our general partner, Cheniere Energy Partners GP, LLC, will manage our operations and activities. Cheniere indirectly owns and controls our general partner. An affiliate of Cheniere will receive an annual administrative fee of $10 million (adjusted for inflation after January 1, 2007), with payment commencing January 1, 2009, for the provision of various general and administrative services to us. Such affiliate will also be entitled to reimbursement of all direct expenses incurred on our behalf following the closing of this offering. Our general partner will also be entitled to distributions on its general partner units and, if specified requirements are met, on its incentive distribution rights. Please read “Cash Distribution Policy and Restrictions on Distributions” and “Certain Relationships and Related Transactions.” Unlike stockholders in a publicly traded corporation, our unitholders will not be entitled to elect our general partner or its directors.

Principal Executive Offices and Internet Address

Our principal executive offices are located at 717 Texas Avenue, Suite 3100, Houston, Texas 77002, and our telephone number is (713) 659-1361. Our website is http://www.cheniereenergypartners.com. We will make our periodic reports and other information filed with or furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission, or SEC, available, free of charge, through our website, as soon as reasonably practicable after those reports and other information are electronically filed with or furnished to the SEC. Information on our website or any other website is not incorporated by reference into this prospectus and does not constitute a part of this prospectus.

Summary of Conflicts of Interest and Fiduciary Duties

Our general partner has a fiduciary duty to manage us in a manner beneficial to our unitholders. However, because our general partner is indirectly wholly-owned by Cheniere, the officers and directors of our general partner also have fiduciary duties to manage the business of our general partner in a manner beneficial to Cheniere. Certain of the executive officers and non-independent directors of our general partner also serve as executive officers and directors of Cheniere. As a result of these relationships, conflicts of interest exist and may arise in the future between us and our unitholders, on the one hand, and our general partner and its affiliates, on the other hand. Cheniere and its affiliates may compete directly with us and do not have an obligation to present business opportunities to us. For more detailed descriptions of the conflicts of interest of our general partner, please read “Risk Factors—Risks Relating to an Investment in Us and Our Common Units” and “Conflicts of Interest and Fiduciary Duties—Conflicts of Interest.”

Our partnership agreement limits the liability and reduces the fiduciary duties of our general partner to our unitholders. Our partnership agreement also restricts the remedies available to unitholders for actions that might otherwise constitute a breach of our general partner’s fiduciary duties owed to our unitholders. By purchasing a common unit, you are treated as having consented to various actions contemplated in the partnership agreement and to conflicts of interest that might otherwise be considered a breach of fiduciary or other duties under applicable state law. Please read “Conflicts of Interest and Fiduciary Duties—Fiduciary Duties” for a description of the fiduciary duties imposed on our general partner by Delaware law, the material modifications of these duties contained in our partnership agreement and certain legal rights and remedies available to our unitholders.

For a description of our other relationships with our affiliates, especially Cheniere Marketing, please read “Certain Relationships and Related Transactions.”

9

Table of Contents

Index to Financial Statements

The Offering

The allocation of the common units to be sold in this offering between us and the selling unitholder will vary based on the actual public offering price and our estimated cost to fund a distribution reserve.

10

Table of Contents

Index to Financial Statements

11

Table of Contents

Index to Financial Statements

12

Table of Contents

Index to Financial Statements

13

Table of Contents

Index to Financial Statements

Forecast of Cash Available to Pay Distributions

The following table summarizes our forecast of the expected revenues, EBITDA and cash available to pay the initial quarterly distribution of $0.425 on all of our outstanding common units, subordinated units and general partner units for each of the four quarters in the twelve-month period ending June 30, 2010. Prior to June 30, 2009, we will use funds from the distribution reserve to pay the initial quarterly distribution of $0.425 on all of our outstanding common units, as well as related distributions to our general partner. This information should be read in conjunction with the more detailed information presented in the table illustrating our forecast of cash available for distribution for the period from March 31, 2007 through June 30, 2010, including the accompanying footnotes, explanations and descriptions of assumptions relating thereto, set forth under “Cash Distribution Policy and Restrictions on Distributions.”

The information set forth below summarizes our anticipated results of operations, including the projected revenues under our 20-year TUAs with Total, Chevron and Cheniere Marketing, for the first four consecutive quarters in which we expect to receive operating revenues under all three TUAs. In preparing this information, we have relied on assumptions regarding circumstances beyond the control of us or any other person. By their nature, the assumptions are subject to significant uncertainties, and actual results will differ, perhaps materially, from those forecasted. We cannot give any assurance that these assumptions are correct or that this information will reflect actual results. Accordingly, this forecast is not intended to be a prediction of future results. If our actual results are materially less favorable than those shown, or if the assumptions used in preparing this information prove to be incorrect, our ability to make distributions to our unitholders may be adversely affected. For additional information relating to our financial forecast, please read “Risk Factors—Risks Relating to Our Cash Distributions—Our financial estimates, including our forecast of cash available for distribution, and our Independent Engineer’s conclusions are based on certain assumptions that may not materialize.” For information about risks relating to Cheniere Marketing’s business as a development stage company, please read “Risk Factors—Risks Relating to Development and Operation of Our Business—We will be dependent for substantially all of our revenues and cash flows on the TUA counterparties, including Cheniere Marketing, which has a limited operating history, limited capital, no credit rating and an unproven business strategy.”

The operating expenses set forth in the table below for the four quarters ending June 30, 2010 may be higher in later years due to numerous factors, such as increased maintenance costs of the Sabine Pass LNG receiving terminal as the facility ages. As a result, the Sabine Pass LNG EBITDA forecast for the fourth quarter ending June 30, 2010 is not indicative of the Sabine Pass LNG EBITDA that may be achieved in the future. Furthermore, Sabine Pass LNG’s EBITDA does not include capital expenditures and other non-operating items that require cash expenditures, which over time may be material to our business and may have a significant negative impact on our cash available for payment of interest on, and the principal of, the Sabine Pass LNG notes.

Approximately one-half of our forecast revenues are attributable to Cheniere Marketing, which is a small, development stage company with virtually no operating history. See “Risk Factors—Risks Relating to Development and Operation of Our Business—We will be dependent for substantially all of our revenues and cash flows on the TUA counterparties. Cheniere Marketing has a limited operating history, limited capital, no credit rating and an unproven business strategy and may not be able to make payments to us under its TUA.” We do not expect to generate sufficient cash flow from operations to repay the Sabine Pass LNG notes upon maturity without additional refinancing, which may not be available on terms reasonably acceptable to us or at all. See “Risk Factors—Risk Relating to Our Business in General—Our substantial indebtedness could adversely affect our ability to operate our business and to pay or increase distributions to you.”

14

Table of Contents

Index to Financial Statements

Forecast of Cash Available for Distribution

Four Quarters Ending June 30, 2010

(in millions)

15

Table of Contents

Index to Financial Statements

Non-GAAP Financial Measure

Sabine Pass LNG’s EBITDA is computed as total revenues less non-cash deferred revenues, operating expenses, assumed commissioning costs and state and local taxes. It does not include depreciation expenses and certain non-operating items. Because we have not forecasted such depreciation expense and non-operating items, we have not made any forecast of net income, which would be the most directly comparable financial measure under generally accepted accounting principles, or GAAP. As a result, we are unable to reconcile differences between forecasts of EBITDA and net income. EBITDA is used as a supplemental financial measure by management and by external users of our financial statements, such as commercial banks, to assess:

Sabine Pass LNG’s EBITDA should not be considered an alternative to net income, operating income, cash flows from operating activities or any other measure of financial performance or liquidity presented in accordance with GAAP. Sabine Pass LNG’s EBITDA excludes some, but not all, items that affect net income and operating income, and these measures may vary among companies. Therefore, Sabine Pass LNG’s EBITDA may not be comparable to similarly titled measures of other companies.

16

Table of Contents

Index to Financial Statements

Selected Financial Data of Our Combined Predecessor Entities

The following tables set forth the selected financial data of our combined predecessor entities for the periods and at the dates indicated. Our combined predecessor entities refer to Cheniere Energy Partners and its wholly-owned subsidiaries, including Sabine Pass LNG.

The combined statement of operations data for the period from October 20, 2003 (inception) through December 31, 2006, for the years ended December 31, 2004, 2005 and 2006, and the combined balance sheet information at December 31, 2005 and 2006 are derived from our audited combined financial statements, which are included elsewhere in this prospectus. The summary combined statement of operations data for the period from October 20, 2003 (inception) through December 31, 2003 and the summary combined balance sheet information at December 31, 2003 and 2004 have been derived from our audited combined financial statements, which are not included in this prospectus. Our past financial or operating performance is not a reliable indicator of our future performance (particularly anticipated revenues, debt costs and expenses), and you should not use our historical performance to anticipate results or future period trends.

We derived the information in the following table from, and that information should be read together with and is qualified in its entirety by reference to, the combined financial statements and the accompanying notes included in this prospectus. The table should also be read together with “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.”

17

Table of Contents

Index to Financial Statements

18

Table of Contents

Index to Financial Statements

RISK FACTORS

Limited partner interests are inherently different from the capital stock of a corporation, although many of the business risks to which we are subject are similar to those that would be faced by a corporation engaged in a similar business. You should carefully consider the following risk factors together with all of the other information included in this prospectus when evaluating an investment in our common units. If any of the following risks were to occur, our business, results of operations and financial condition could be materially adversely affected. In that case, we might not be able to pay distributions on our common units, the trading price of our common units could decline, and you could lose all or part of your investment.

The risk factors in this section are grouped into the following categories:

Risks Relating to Our Business in General

We are a development stage company without any revenues, operating cash flows, operating history or experience constructing, operating or maintaining an LNG facility, and if we are unable to complete construction of the Sabine Pass LNG receiving terminal or if our customers fail to perform under their contracts for whatever reason, our business will be materially and adversely affected and you could lose all or a significant portion of your investment.

We are a newly-formed development stage company with no revenues, operating cash flows or operating history. We had net losses of $72.5 million for the period from inception through December 31, 2006. We expect to continue to incur losses and experience negative operating cash flow through 2008 and to incur significant capital expenditures through completion of development of the Sabine Pass LNG receiving terminal. Any delays beyond the expected development periods for the Sabine Pass LNG receiving terminal would prolong, and could increase the level of, our operating losses and negative operating cash flows. Neither we nor Cheniere and its affiliates have ever managed the construction, operation or maintenance of an LNG facility.

As more fully discussed in subsequent risk factors, our ability to generate sufficient cash flow to pay the initial quarterly distribution on all units is dependent on the successful and timely completion of the Sabine Pass LNG receiving terminal and on the ability of our three customers, Chevron, Total and Cheniere Marketing, to perform their obligations under their TUAs. Cheniere Marketing has a limited operating history, and Cheniere has a non-investment grade corporate rating. As a result, Cheniere Marketing and Cheniere have a higher risk of being financially unable to perform on the Cheniere Marketing TUA than either Chevron or Total under their TUAs.

Until we begin to receive cash flows under all three of our TUAs in 2009, all or a portion of our distributions to you will be a return of your investment.

Except to the extent that we receive revenues under TUAs, all distributions on our common units will be made from the distribution reserve through the distribution in respect of the second quarter of 2009 and will be a return of your investment. We do not expect to receive any TUA revenues until 2008, and we do not expect to receive sufficient revenues under our TUAs to make all other required cash expenditures and cover all distributions to you until the third quarter of 2009.

19

Table of Contents

Index to Financial Statements

Our substantial indebtedness could adversely affect our ability to operate our business and to pay or increase distributions to you.

As of December 31, 2006, we had $2,032 million of indebtedness, consisting entirely of the Sabine Pass LNG notes. Our substantial indebtedness could have important consequences, including:

Under some circumstances, our substantial indebtedness and the restrictive covenants contained in our debt agreements may not allow us the flexibility that we need to operate our business in an effective and efficient manner and may prevent us from taking advantage of strategic and financial opportunities that would benefit our business. See also “—Risks Relating to Our Cash Distributions—Sabine Pass LNG may be restricted under the terms of the indenture governing the Sabine Pass LNG notes from making distributions to us and from incurring additional indebtedness under certain circumstances, which may limit our ability to pay or increase distributions to you.”

Our ability to satisfy our obligations will depend upon our future operating performance. Prevailing economic conditions and financial, business and other factors, many of which are beyond our control, will affect our ability to make payments on our debt obligations. We do not expect to receive full contracted revenues under the Cheniere Marketing TUA until the first quarter of 2009 and under the Total and Chevron TUAs until the second and third quarters of 2009, respectively. If we cannot thereafter generate sufficient cash from operations to meet our other obligations, we may need to refinance all or a portion of our indebtedness, including the Sabine Pass LNG notes, on or before maturity. We may not be able to refinance any of our indebtedness on commercially reasonable terms or at all.

Risks Relating to Completion of the Sabine Pass LNG Receiving Terminal

Sabine Pass LNG’s inability to timely construct and commission the Sabine Pass LNG receiving terminal would prevent it from commencing operations when anticipated and would delay or prevent it, and consequently us, from realizing anticipated cash flows.

Sabine Pass LNG may not complete Phase 1 or Phase 2 – Stage 1 of the Sabine Pass LNG receiving terminal in a timely manner, or at all, due to numerous factors, some of which are beyond our control. Factors that could adversely affect our planned completion include:

20

Table of Contents

Index to Financial Statements

Sabine Pass LNG’s inability to timely complete the Sabine Pass LNG receiving terminal, including as a result of any of the foregoing factors, could prevent it from commencing operations when anticipated, which could delay payments under the TUAs. As a result, we may not receive our anticipated cash flows on time or at all.

We are dependent on Bechtel and other contractors for the successful completion of the Sabine Pass LNG receiving terminal.

We have no experience constructing LNG receiving terminals and limited experience working with EPC contractors, including Bechtel, and with other construction contractors. Timely and cost-effective completion of the Sabine Pass LNG receiving terminal in compliance with agreed specifications is central to our business strategy and is highly dependent on our contractors’ performance under their agreements with Sabine Pass LNG. Our contractors’ ability to perform successfully under their contracts is dependent on a number of factors, including their ability to:

These risks are heightened for Phase 2 – Stage 1, which is still in the contracting phase. A substantial number of contracts, such as for performing portions of or supplying materials for Phase 2 – Stage 1, remain to be negotiated for Phase 2 – Stage 1, and we may be unable to reach satisfactory arrangements for these contracts. As a result, the scope, design, timing and cost for Phase 2 – Stage 1 construction are not as well defined as they

21

Table of Contents

Index to Financial Statements

are for Phase 1, and therefore the risk of delays, cost overruns or non-completion is greater for Phase 2 – Stage 1 than for Phase 1.

Although some of our EPC contracts provide for liquidated damages, if the contractor fails to perform in the manner required with respect to certain of its obligations, the events that trigger a requirement to pay liquidated damages may delay or impair the operation of the Sabine Pass LNG receiving terminal, and any liquidated damages that we receive may not be sufficient to cover the damages that we suffer as a result of any such delay or impairment. In addition, each contractor’s liability for liquidated damages is subject to a cap. Each of our material agreements with contractors is also subject to termination by the contractor prior to completion of construction under certain circumstances, including extended delays (of 100 days or more) caused by force majeure events and our insolvency, breach of material obligations not subject to adjustment by change order, or failure to pay undisputed amounts. Please read “Description of Principal Construction Agreements” for further information.

Furthermore, we may have disagreements with our contractors about different elements of the construction process, which could lead to the assertion of rights and remedies under their contracts and increase the cost of the project or result in a contractor’s unwillingness to perform further work on the project. If any contractor is unable or unwilling to perform according to the negotiated terms and timetable of its respective agreement for any reason or terminates its agreement, Sabine Pass LNG would be required to engage a substitute contractor. This would likely result in significant project delays and increased costs.

The failure of our contractors to perform under their contracts for any of the reasons described above may extend the date on which our TUA customers are required to begin making payments to us. This delay in payments could have a material adverse effect on our cash flows and results of operations and on our ability to make distributions to you in a timely manner, or at all.

We may experience cost overruns and delays in the completion of Phase 1 or Phase 2 – Stage 1 of the Sabine Pass LNG receiving terminal as well as difficulties in obtaining funding for any additional costs, which could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and ability to make cash distributions to our unitholders.

Our construction costs for Phase 1 and for Phase 2 – Stage 1 may be significantly higher than our current estimates as a result of cost overruns, change orders under existing or future construction contracts, increased component and material costs, escalating labor costs, limited availability of labor, delays in construction and increased spending to maintain construction schedules. We may also incur commissioning costs in excess of our forecast. As of February 14, 2007, change orders for $121.3 million have been approved under the Phase 1 EPC agreement with Bechtel. We do not have any prior experience in constructing LNG receiving terminals, and no LNG receiving terminal has been constructed and placed in service in the United States in almost 25 years, as a result of which there are limited benchmarks against which to compare our estimates. If our construction costs are higher than estimated, our cash available for distribution to unitholders may be reduced.

Furthermore, in order to cover not only increased costs but also the cost of a sixth LNG storage tank that we may be required to construct if requested by Cheniere Marketing under its TUA, we may need to obtain additional funding. If we fail to obtain sufficient funding and Sabine Pass LNG fails to complete Phase 1, our business plan could fail. If Phase 1 is satisfactorily completed but funding is not sufficient for completion of Phase 2 – Stage 1, Sabine Pass LNG will be entitled to receive payments under the TUAs, including the Cheniere Marketing TUA, but Cheniere Marketing may not have access to regasification capacity or other resources or business opportunities sufficient to generate cash flow to fund its required payments to Sabine Pass LNG under the Cheniere Marketing TUA. This could cause Cheniere Marketing to default on its obligations, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, financial condition and prospects.

Our ability to obtain debt or equity financing that may be needed to provide additional funding to cover increased costs will depend, in part, on factors beyond our control, such as the status of various capital and

22

Table of Contents

Index to Financial Statements

industry markets at the time financing is sought. Accordingly, we may not be able to obtain financing on terms that are acceptable to us, if at all. Even if we are able to obtain financing, we may have to accept terms that are disadvantageous to us or that may have a material adverse effect on our current or future business, results of operations, financial condition and prospects.

To commission the Sabine Pass LNG receiving terminal, Sabine Pass LNG must purchase and process LNG. Sabine Pass LNG has not previously purchased or processed any LNG.

The Sabine Pass LNG receiving terminal must undergo a commissioning process for its storage tanks and other equipment before commencement of commercial operation. The commissioning process will require a substantial quantity of LNG as well as access to adequate LNG tankers to deliver the LNG.

Our construction cost estimates do not include the costs of acquiring this LNG (other than a minor portion we refer to as “heel” LNG) at the Sabine Pass LNG receiving terminal, which we have projected will be approximately $157.5 million for purposes of calculating forecasted cash available for distribution to unitholders in this prospectus. Please read “Cash Distribution Policy and Restrictions on Distributions—Forecast of Cash Available for Distribution.” Our actual cost to obtain LNG for the commissioning process could exceed our estimates, and the overrun could be significant.

Sabine Pass LNG faces several principal risks associated with this required purchase of LNG, including the following:

The failure of Sabine Pass LNG to obtain LNG, tankers or both, or its inability to finance the purchase of LNG needed for commissioning, would impede commencement of commercial operation at the Sabine Pass LNG receiving terminal, which could delay the date on which our TUA customers are required to begin making payments to us. This delay in payments could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, financial condition and prospects.

To commission the Sabine Pass LNG receiving terminal, Sabine Pass LNG must obtain natural gas pipeline transportation access. The required pipeline infrastructure is under development by a Cheniere entity but has not yet been constructed.

The commissioning process for the Sabine Pass LNG receiving terminal is dependent upon completion of pipeline infrastructure to supply natural gas for power generation units prior to delivery of cool down LNG and to take away natural gas produced in the commissioning process. We expect to obtain access to the natural gas required for the commissioning process from a four-inch diameter pipeline, approximately 5,000 feet in length, that we will construct from the Sabine Pass LNG receiving terminal to a third-party pipeline. This pipeline infrastructure has not been constructed, and its timely completion is subject to numerous risks, such as weather delays, accidents and inability to obtain required rights-of-way and governmental approvals.

23

Table of Contents

Index to Financial Statements

Failure to obtain and maintain approvals and permits from governmental and regulatory agencies with respect to the development of the Sabine Pass LNG receiving terminal or related pipeline infrastructure could impede completion and have a material adverse effect on us.

The design, construction and operation of LNG receiving terminals are all highly regulated activities. The FERC’s approval under Section 3 of the Natural Gas Act of 1938, as well as several other material governmental and regulatory approvals and permits, are required in order to construct and operate the Sabine Pass LNG receiving terminal. Although Sabine Pass LNG has obtained Section 3 authorization to construct and operate the Sabine Pass LNG receiving terminal, such authorization is subject to ongoing conditions imposed by the FERC. Sabine Pass LNG also has not obtained several other material governmental and regulatory approvals and permits required in order to construct and operate Phase 2 – Stage 1 of the Sabine Pass LNG receiving terminal, and third parties have not obtained approvals and permits to develop related pipeline infrastructure, including several under the Clean Air Act and the Clean Water Act from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and the Louisiana Department of Environmental Quality. We have no control over the outcome of the review and approval process. We do not know whether or when any such approvals or permits can be obtained, or whether or not any existing or potential interventions or other actions by third parties will interfere with Sabine Pass LNG’s ability to obtain and maintain such permits or approvals. Failure to obtain and maintain any of these approvals and permits could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, financial condition and prospects.

Hurricanes or other disasters could result in a delay in the completion of the Sabine Pass LNG receiving terminal, higher construction costs and the deferral of the dates on which our TUA counterparties are obligated to begin making payments to us.

In August and September of 2005, Hurricanes Katrina and Rita and related storm activity, including windstorms, storm surges, floods and tornadoes, caused extensive and catastrophic damage to coastal and inland areas located in the Gulf Coast region of the U.S. (parts of Texas, Louisiana, Mississippi and Alabama) and certain other parts of the southeastern U.S. Construction at the Sabine Pass LNG receiving terminal site was temporarily suspended in connection with Hurricane Katrina, as a precautionary measure. Approximately three weeks after the occurrence of Hurricane Katrina, the terminal site was again secured and evacuated in anticipation of Hurricane Rita, the eye of which made landfall to the east of the site. As a result of these 2005 storms and related matters, the Sabine Pass LNG receiving terminal experienced construction delays and increased costs totaling approximately $30.6 million.

Future similar storms and related storm activity and collateral effects, or other disasters such as explosions, fires, floods or accidents, could result in damage to, delays or cost increases in construction of, or interruption of operations at, the Sabine Pass LNG receiving terminal or related infrastructure.

Risks Relating to Our Cash Distributions

We may not have sufficient cash from operations to enable us to fund the initial quarterly distribution following establishment of cash reserves and payment of fees and expenses, including payments to our general partner and funding of capital expenditures.

We plan to retain cash in a distribution reserve sufficient to fund the initial quarterly distribution only through the distribution made in respect of the quarter ending June 30, 2009. After that time, we may not have sufficient available cash each quarter to pay the initial quarterly distribution. The amount of cash that we can distribute on our common units principally will depend upon the amount of cash that we generate from our operations, which will be based on, among other things:

24

Table of Contents

Index to Financial Statements

In addition, the actual amount of cash that we will have available for distribution will depend on other factors such as:

Sabine Pass LNG may be restricted under the terms of the indenture governing the Sabine Pass LNG notes from making distributions to us and from incurring additional indebtedness under certain circumstances, which may limit our ability to pay or increase distributions to you.

The indenture governing the Sabine Pass LNG notes restricts payments that Sabine Pass LNG can make to us in certain events and limits the indebtedness that Sabine Pass LNG can incur. Please read “Indebtedness.” Prior to Phase 1 Target Completion, as defined in the indenture, which we anticipate will not occur until the second quarter of 2008, Sabine Pass LNG will not be permitted to pay any distributions to us. Following Phase 1 Target Completion, Sabine Pass LNG will be permitted to pay distributions to us only after the following payments have been made:

In addition, Sabine Pass LNG will only be able to make distributions to us in the event that it could, among other things, incur at least $1.00 of additional indebtedness under the fixed charge coverage ratio test of 2.0 to 1.0 at the time of payment and after giving pro forma effect to the distribution. Please read “Indebtedness—Indenture—Covenants—Indebtedness” for the method of calculating the fixed charge coverage ratio.

25

Table of Contents

Index to Financial Statements

Sabine Pass LNG will also be prohibited under the indenture governing the Sabine Pass LNG notes from paying distributions to us or incurring additional indebtedness upon the occurrence of any of the following events, among others:

Sabine Pass LNG’s inability to pay distributions to us or to incur additional indebtedness as a result of the foregoing restrictions in the indenture governing the Sabine Pass LNG notes may inhibit our ability to pay or increase distributions to you.

After March 31, 2009, the fixed charge coverage ratio test contained in the indenture governing the Sabine Pass LNG notes could prevent Sabine Pass LNG from making cash distributions to us. As a result, we may be prevented from making distributions to our unitholders, which could materially and adversely affect the market price of our common units.

After March 31, 2009, Sabine Pass LNG will not be permitted to make cash distributions to us if its consolidated cash flow is not at least twice its fixed charges, calculated as required in the indenture. See “Indebtedness—Indenture—Covenants” for more detail regarding this calculation. In order to satisfy this fixed charge coverage ratio test after March 31, 2009, we estimate that Sabine Pass LNG’s revenues under its TUAs must aggregate at least approximately $350 million per year. Accordingly, we will not receive cash distributions from Sabine Pass LNG if Sabine Pass LNG does not receive, in addition to the approximately $250 million per year of contracted annual revenues from the Total and Chevron TUAs, substantial revenues under the Cheniere Marketing TUA or from one or more substitute customers.

Cheniere Marketing is a development stage company with a limited operating history, limited capital, no credit rating and an unproven business strategy. It may never develop its business, assets or revenues sufficiently to pay its fees under its TUA. Cheniere has guaranteed 100% of the obligations of Cheniere Marketing under its TUA. Cheniere has a non-investment grade corporate rating of B from Standard & Poor’s. If Cheniere does not receive sufficient future cash flows from businesses that Cheniere is developing, Cheniere may be unable to perform its guarantee of the Cheniere Marketing TUA.

In addition, even if Sabine Pass LNG receives the contracted payments under the Cheniere Marketing TUA, the fixed charge coverage test will not be satisfied if those payments do not constitute revenues under GAAP as then in effect and as provided in the indenture governing the Sabine Pass LNG notes. Because the Cheniere

26

Table of Contents

Index to Financial Statements

Marketing TUA is an agreement between related parties, payments under the Cheniere Marketing TUA may not constitute revenues under GAAP as currently in effect if Cheniere Marketing is determined to lack economic substance apart from Sabine Pass LNG. We believe Cheniere Marketing could be determined to lack economic substance apart from Sabine Pass LNG if, for example, Cheniere Marketing has no substantive business and is not pursuing, and has no prospect of developing, any substantive business apart from its TUA with Sabine Pass LNG.

If we do not receive distributions from Sabine Pass LNG, we may not be able to continue to make distributions to our unitholders, which could have a material and adverse effect on the perceived value of our partnership and the market price of our common units.

The indenture governing the Sabine Pass LNG notes may prevent Sabine Pass LNG from engaging in certain beneficial transactions.

In addition to restrictions on the ability of Sabine Pass LNG to make distributions or incur additional indebtedness, the indenture governing the Sabine Pass LNG notes also contains various other covenants that may prevent it from engaging in beneficial transactions, including limitations on the ability of Sabine Pass LNG or certain of its subsidiaries to:

Management fees and cost reimbursements due to our general partner and its affiliates will reduce cash available to pay distributions to you.

We will pay significant management fees to our general partner and its affiliates and reimburse them for expenses incurred on our behalf, which will reduce our cash available for distribution to you. These fees and expenses are payable as follows:

27

Table of Contents

Index to Financial Statements

Our general partner and its affiliates will also be entitled to reimbursement for all other direct expenses that they incur on our behalf. The payment of fees to our general partner and its affiliates and the reimbursement of expenses could adversely affect our ability to pay cash distributions to you. Please read “Conflicts of Interest and Fiduciary Duties—Conflicts of Interest.”

The amount of cash that we have available for distributions to you will depend primarily on our cash flow and not solely on profitability.

The amount of cash that we will have available for distributions will depend primarily on our cash flow, including cash reserves and working capital or other borrowings, and not solely on profitability, which will be affected by non-cash items. As a result, we may make cash distributions during periods when we record losses, and we may not make cash distributions during periods when we record net income.

We will not be able to increase the distributions on our common units unless we are able to make accretive acquisitions.

We will not be able to increase distributions on our common units by generating additional cash flows from Phase 1 and Phase 2 – Stage 1 of the Sabine Pass LNG receiving terminal because the entire capacity of the Sabine Pass LNG receiving terminal has already been reserved under fixed fee TUAs with three customers. As a result, we must make accretive acquisitions of additional cash-generating assets and operations in order to increase the quarterly distributions on our common units.

Our financial estimates, including our forecast of cash available for distribution, and our Independent Engineer’s conclusions are based on certain assumptions that may not materialize.

The financial estimates that we have included in this prospectus, including under “Summary—Forecast of Cash Available to Pay Distributions” and “Cash Distribution Policy and Restrictions on Distributions—Cash Distributions” are based upon assumptions and information that we believe are reliable as of today. However, these estimates and assumptions are inherently subject to significant business, economic and other uncertainties, many of which are beyond our control. Financial estimates are necessarily speculative in nature, and you should expect that some or all of the assumptions will not materialize. Actual results will probably vary from the estimates, and the variations will likely be material and are likely to increase over time. Consequently, the inclusion of estimates in this prospectus should not be regarded as a representation by us or the underwriters or any other person that the estimated results will actually be achieved. Moreover, we do not intend to update or otherwise revise the estimates to reflect events or circumstances after the date of this prospectus or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events. Undue reliance should not be placed on the estimates contained in this prospectus. Our estimates were not prepared with a view toward compliance with the guidelines of the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants. Moreover, no independent accountants compiled or examined the estimates, and, accordingly, our independent registered public accounting firm does not express an opinion or any other form of assurance with respect to our estimates and assume no responsibility for, and disclaim any association with, the estimates.

In the preparation of its report, the Independent Engineer relied on assumptions regarding circumstances beyond the control of us or any other person. By their nature, these assumptions are subject to significant uncertainties, and actual results will differ, perhaps materially, from those stated in the Independent Engineer’s report. We cannot give any assurance that these assumptions will prove to be correct. If our actual results are materially less favorable than those shown in the Independent Engineer’s report, or if the assumptions in the Independent Engineer’s report on which we rely for certain of our financial estimates, prove to be incorrect, Sabine Pass LNG’s ability to pay distributions to us, and our ability to pay distributions to our unitholders, may be adversely affected.

28

Table of Contents

Index to Financial Statements

Risks Relating to Development and Operation of Our Business

We will be dependent for substantially all of our revenues and cash flows on the TUA counterparties. Cheniere Marketing has a limited operating history, limited capital, no credit rating and an unproven business strategy, and may not be able to make payments to us under its TUA.

We will be dependent on the Chevron, Total and Cheniere Marketing TUAs for substantially all of our operating revenues and cash flows. Each of Chevron and Total will pay approximately $125 million annually when payments under those contracts commence, and Cheniere Marketing will pay approximately $250 million annually commencing in 2009. In order for us to pay the initial quarterly distribution on all of our units, our TUA counterparties must pay these amounts in full. We are also exposed to the credit risk of the guarantors of our customers’ obligations under the TUAs in the event that Sabine Pass LNG must seek recourse under a guaranty, and any nonpayment or nonperformance by the guarantors could reduce the ability of Sabine Pass LNG to pay distributions to us and, in turn, our ability to pay distributions to our unitholders.

Cheniere Marketing has a limited operating history, limited capital and an unproven business strategy. Cheniere Marketing has no credit rating, and Cheniere has a non-investment grade corporate rating of B from Standard and Poor’s, indicating that Cheniere Marketing and Cheniere have a higher risk of being financially unable to perform on the Cheniere Marketing TUA than either Chevron or Total have with respect to their TUAs. Although each of our TUA counterparties faces a risk that it will not be able to enter into commercial arrangements for the use of its capacity at the Sabine Pass LNG receiving terminal to support the payment of its obligations under its TUA, due to negative developments in the LNG industry or for other reasons, that risk is greater for Cheniere Marketing than for Total and Chevron. The principal risks attendant to Cheniere Marketing’s future ability to generate operating cash flow to support its TUA obligations include the following:

In pursuing each aspect of its planned business, Cheniere Marketing will encounter intense competition, including competition from major oil companies and other competitors with significantly greater resources.

29

Table of Contents

Index to Financial Statements

Cheniere Marketing will also compete with our other customers and may compete with Cheniere and its other subsidiaries that are developing or operating other LNG receiving terminals and related infrastructure, which may include vessels, pipelines and storage. Cheniere Marketing’s regasification capacity at the Sabine Pass LNG receiving terminal, in particular, will be marketed in competition with existing capacity and additional future capacity offered by other terminals that currently exist or that may be completed or expanded in the future by Cheniere affiliates or others.

Any or all of these factors, as well as other risk factors that we or Cheniere Marketing may not be able to anticipate, control or mitigate, could materially and adversely affect the business, results of operations, financial condition, prospects and liquidity of Cheniere Marketing, which in turn could have a material adverse effect upon us.

Sabine Pass LNG may be required to purchase natural gas to provide fuel at the Sabine Pass LNG receiving terminal, which would increase operating costs and could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations.

Sabine Pass LNG’s three TUAs provide for an in-kind deduction of 2% of the LNG delivered to the Sabine Pass LNG receiving terminal, which it will use primarily as fuel for revaporization and self-generated power and to cover natural gas unavoidably lost at the facility. There is a risk that this 2% in-kind deduction will be insufficient for these needs and that Sabine Pass LNG will have to purchase additional natural gas from third parties. Sabine Pass LNG has no arrangements in place to obtain any such natural gas and will bear the risk of changing prices with respect to additional natural gas that it may need to purchase for fuel.

The inability to import LNG into the U.S. could materially adversely affect our customers, particularly Cheniere Marketing, and our business plans and results of operations if Sabine Pass LNG has to replace TUAs that terminate or expire.

Upon completion of the Sabine Pass LNG receiving terminal, our business will be dependent upon the ability of our customers to import LNG supplies into the U.S. Political instability in foreign countries that have supplies of natural gas, or strained relations between such countries and the U.S., may impede the willingness or ability of LNG suppliers in such countries to export LNG to the U.S. Such foreign suppliers may also be able to negotiate more favorable prices with other LNG customers around the world than with customers in the U.S., thereby reducing the supply of LNG available to be imported into the U.S. market. Any significant impediment to the ability to import LNG into the U.S. could have a material adverse affect on Sabine Pass LNG’s customers, particularly Cheniere Marketing, and on our business, results of operations, financial condition and prospects. In addition, the quality of LNG available for importation may not meet the quality specifications of the pipelines interconnected with or downstream of the Sabine Pass LNG receiving terminal, and the terminal and its customers do not have plans or equipment in place to condition such LNG to meet the pipeline specifications. The inability to import LNG into the U.S. may also limit the LNG assets being constructed, and therefore, our potential acquisition opportunities, which may limit our ability to increase distributions to you.

Failure of sufficient LNG liquefaction capacity to be constructed worldwide could adversely affect the performance by our customers, particularly Cheniere Marketing, of their obligations under the TUAs and could reduce our operating revenues, cause us operating losses and adversely affect our ability to make or increase distributions.

Commercial development of an LNG liquefaction facility can take a number of years and requires a very substantial capital investment. Many factors could negatively affect continued development of LNG liquefaction facilities, including:

30

Table of Contents

Index to Financial Statements

If sufficient LNG liquefaction capacity is not constructed, our customers, particularly Cheniere Marketing, may find it difficult to obtain sufficient utilization of their capacity at the Sabine Pass LNG receiving terminal to support their obligations under their TUAs. A lack of growth in liquefaction capacity may also limit the LNG assets being constructed and therefore, our potential acquisition opportunities, which may limit our ability to increase distributions to you.

A shortage of LNG tankers worldwide could adversely affect the performance by our customers, particularly Cheniere Marketing, of their obligations under the TUAs and could reduce our operating revenues, cause us operating losses and adversely affect our ability to make or increase distributions.

We believe that the existing fleet of tankers that is available to transport LNG is inadequate, and the failure to expand LNG tanker capacity would impede our customers’ ability to import LNG into the U.S. The construction and delivery of additional LNG vessels require significant capital, and the availability of the vessels could be delayed to the detriment of our customers because of:

Failure of imported LNG to become a competitive source of energy in North America could adversely affect the performance by our customers, particularly Cheniere Marketing, of their obligations under the TUAs and could reduce our operating revenues, cause us operating losses and adversely affect our ability to make or increase distributions.

In North America, due mainly to an historically abundant supply of natural gas, imported LNG has not been a major energy source in the past. Cheniere Marketing’s business plan is based, in part, on the belief that LNG can be produced and delivered at a lower cost than the cost to produce some domestic supplies of natural gas, or other alternative energy sources. Through the use of improved exploration technologies, additional sources of natural gas may be discovered in North America, which could further increase the available supply of natural gas at a lower cost than LNG. In addition to natural gas, LNG also competes with other sources of energy, including coal, oil, nuclear, hydroelectric, wind and solar energy. As a result, LNG may not become a competitive source of energy in North America. The failure of LNG to become a competitive supply alternative to domestic natural gas, oil and other import alternatives could adversely affect the performance by our customers, particularly Cheniere Marketing, of their obligations under the TUAs and could reduce our operating revenues, cause us operating losses and adversely affect our ability to make or increase distributions. In addition, other continents have a longer history of importing LNG and, due to their geographic proximity to LNG producers and limited domestic natural gas supplies, may be willing and able to pay more for LNG, thereby limiting the supply of LNG available in North American markets. The failure of LNG to become a competitive supply alternative may impede the ability of our customers, particularly Cheniere Marketing, to obtain customers for regasified LNG, which may decrease their revenues and ability to make payments under their TUAs and result in a default of their payment obligations thereunder.

31

Table of Contents

Index to Financial Statements

Decreases in the price of natural gas could lead to reduced development of LNG projects worldwide, which could adversely affect the performance by our customers, particularly Cheniere Marketing, of their obligations under the TUAs and could reduce our operating revenues, cause us operating losses and adversely affect our ability to make or increase distributions.

The development of domestic LNG receiving terminals and LNG projects generally is based on assumptions about the future price of natural gas and the availability of imported LNG. Natural gas prices have been, and are likely to continue to be, volatile and subject to wide fluctuations in response to any of the following factors:

The willingness of potential customers to contract for regasification capacity would be negatively impacted and, once facilities are in operation, LNG throughput volumes would likely decline if the price of natural gas in North America is, or is forecast to be, lower than the cost to produce and deliver LNG to North American markets. Any significant decline in the price of natural gas could cause the cost of natural gas produced from imported LNG to be higher than domestically produced natural gas. As a result, our customers, particularly Cheniere Marketing, may not be able to procure supplies of LNG or customers for regasified LNG, which may decrease their revenues and ability to make payments under the TUAs and result in a default of their payments obligations thereunder. Such payment defaults may have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, financial condition and prospects. In addition, a decline in the price of natural gas may result in fewer LNG assets being constructed or available for acquisition by us at a given time and, therefore, limit our ability to increase distributions to you.

Cyclical changes in the demand for LNG regasification capacity may adversely affect the performance by our customers, particularly Cheniere Marketing, of their obligations under the TUAs and could reduce our operating revenues, cause us operating losses and adversely affect our ability to make or increase distributions.

The economics of Sabine Pass LNG terminal operations could be subject to cyclical swings, reflecting alternating periods of under-supply and over-supply of LNG importation capacity and available natural gas, principally due to the combined impact of several factors, including:

32

Table of Contents

Index to Financial Statements

These changes in the economics of LNG terminal operations could materially adversely affect the ability of our customers, including Cheniere Marketing, to procure supplies of LNG to be imported into North America and to procure customers for regasified LNG at economical prices, or at all. If and when the TUAs terminate or expire, unfavorable economic conditions that affect our customers could, in turn, for similar reasons, reduce our operating revenues, cause us operating losses and adversely affect our ability to make or increase distributions. In addition, these cyclical changes may result in fewer LNG assets being constructed or available for acquisition by us at a given time and, therefore, limit our ability to increase distributions to you.

We may experience increased labor costs, and the unavailability of skilled workers or our failure to retain key personnel could hurt our ability to construct and operate the Sabine Pass LNG receiving terminal.

Companies in our industry, including us, are dependent upon the available labor pool of skilled employees. We compete with other energy companies and other employers to attract and retain qualified personnel with the technical skills and experience required to construct the Sabine Pass LNG receiving terminal and, upon commencement of commercial operation, to provide our customers with the highest quality service. A shortage in the labor pool of skilled workers or other general inflationary pressures or changes in applicable laws and regulations could make it more difficult to attract and retain personnel and could require an increase in the wage and benefits packages that we offer, thereby increasing our operating costs and reducing cash available for distribution. For example, in the aftermaths of Hurricanes Katrina and Rita, Bechtel and certain subcontractors temporarily experienced a shortage of available skilled labor necessary to meet the requirements of the Phase 1 construction plan. As a result, Sabine Pass LNG agreed to change orders with Bechtel concerning additional activities and expenditures to mitigate the hurricanes’ effects on the completion of Phase 1 of the Sabine Pass LNG receiving terminal. Any increase in our operating costs could materially adversely affect our business, results of operations, financial condition and prospects.

We may face competition from competitors with far greater resources, as well as potential overcapacity in the LNG receiving terminal marketplace.

Many companies are considering or pursuing the development of infrastructure in the domestic LNG market, including major oil and natural gas companies such as Chevron Corporation, ConocoPhillips, ExxonMobil, Royal Dutch/Shell and Total. Other energy companies such as AES, Dominion, El Paso Corporation, Excelerate Energy, McMoRan Exploration, Occidental Petroleum, Sempra, Suez and other public and private companies have also proposed developing or expanding LNG receiving facilities in North America, both onshore and offshore. Almost all of these competitors have longer operating histories, more development experience, greater name recognition, larger staffs and substantially greater financial, technical and marketing resources and access to LNG supply than we and our affiliates do. The superior resources that these competitors have available for deployment could allow them to compete successfully against us, if and when Sabine Pass LNG’s TUAs terminate or expire, and/or against Cheniere Marketing, which could have a material adverse effect on us.

Industry analysts have predicted that if a substantial number of the proposed LNG receiving terminals in North America that have been announced by developers were actually built, there would likely be substantial excess capacity available from such terminals in the future. In addition, the Sabine Pass LNG receiving terminal will likely continue to face competition when and if it is completed, including competition from North American sources of natural gas and onshore, offshore and shipboard LNG regasification facilities. The Sabine Pass LNG receiving terminal will also compete with the Corpus Christi and Creole Trail LNG receiving terminals that Cheniere is proposing to develop and the Freeport LNG receiving terminal that is currently under construction and in which Cheniere owns a minority interest. If the number of LNG receiving terminals built outstrips demand for natural gas from those terminals, the excess capacity could have a material adverse effect on Cheniere Marketing, or on us in the event Sabine Pass LNG has to replace its TUAs, and on our business, results of operations, financial condition and prospects.

33

Table of Contents

Index to Financial Statements

Each of the three TUAs that Sabine Pass LNG has entered into is subject to termination by the contractual counterparty under certain circumstances, and Sabine Pass LNG is dependent on the performance of those counterparties under the TUAs.

Sabine Pass LNG has entered into long-term TUAs with Total, Chevron and Cheniere Marketing. Each of the TUAs contains various termination rights. For example, each counterparty may terminate its TUA if the Sabine Pass LNG receiving terminal experiences a force majeure delay for longer than 18 months, fails to deliver a specified amount of natural gas redelivery nominations or fails to receive or unload a specified number of LNG cargoes. Please read “Business—Customers.” Sabine Pass LNG may not be able to replace these TUAs on desirable terms, or at all, if they are terminated. In the case of each of these TUAs, Sabine Pass LNG is dependent on the respective counterparty’s continued willingness and ability to perform its obligations under the TUAs. If any of these counterparties fails to perform its obligations under its respective TUA, our business, results of operations, financial condition and prospects could be materially adversely affected, even if Sabine Pass LNG was to be ultimately successful in seeking damages from that counterparty or its guarantor for a breach of the TUA.

We will be entirely dependent on Cheniere, including employees of Cheniere and its subsidiaries, for key personnel, and a loss of key personnel could have a material adverse effect on our business.

As of December 31, 2006, Cheniere and its subsidiaries had approximately 238 full-time employees, who, for the most part, were focused on the development of three LNG receiving terminals and other complementary businesses. As construction of the Sabine Pass LNG receiving terminal progresses, we will have to hire or otherwise arrange with Cheniere affiliates for new onsite employees to manage the facility. Before the Sabine Pass LNG receiving terminal commences operations, we will also have to hire or otherwise arrange for an entire staff to operate the facility, which will increase the personnel needed to operate the facility from 12 as of December 31, 2006 to 65 in the first quarter of 2008, at an estimated annual cost of approximately $5.3 million. We will rely to a significant extent on the new personnel that we hire or otherwise arrange to perform these functions. As our operations expand, our general partner, Sabine Pass LNG’s general partner and other Cheniere subsidiaries will also have to expand their administrative staffs. If we or those other entities are not able to successfully manage the expansion, our business, results of operations, financial condition and prospects could be materially adversely affected.

Our general partner’s executive officers are also officers of Cheniere and its affiliates. Please read “Management—Directors and Executive Officers of Our General Partner.” We do not maintain key person life insurance policies on any personnel. Although Cheniere has arranged agreements relating to compensation and benefits with certain of our general partner’s executive officers, our general partner does not have any employment contracts or other agreements with key personnel binding them to provide services for any particular term. The loss of the services of any of these individuals, including Messrs. Souki, Horton and Turkleson, could have a material adverse effect on our business. In addition, our future success will depend in part on our general partner’s ability to engage, and Cheniere’s ability to attract and retain, additional qualified personnel.

If we do not make acquisitions on economically acceptable terms, our future growth and our ability to increase distributions to you will be limited.

Our ability to grow depends on our ability to make accretive acquisitions. We may be unable to make accretive acquisitions for any of the following reasons:

34

Table of Contents

Index to Financial Statements

If we are unable to make accretive acquisitions, then our future growth and ability to increase distributions to you will be limited.

We intend to pursue acquisitions of additional LNG receiving terminals, natural gas pipelines and related assets in the future, either directly from Cheniere or from third parties. However, Cheniere is not obligated to offer us any of these assets. If Cheniere does offer us the opportunity to purchase assets, we may not be able to successfully negotiate a purchase and sale agreement and related agreements, we may not be able to obtain any required financing for such purchase and we may not be able to obtain any required governmental and third-party consents. The decision whether or not to accept such offer, and to negotiate the terms of such offer, will be made by the conflicts committee of our general partner, which may decline the opportunity to accept such offer for a variety of reasons, including a determination that the acquisition of the assets at the proposed purchase price would not result in an increase, or a sufficient increase, in our adjusted operating surplus per unit within an appropriate timeframe.

Acquisitions involve risks that may adversely affect our business and ability to make distributions to you.

Any acquisition involves potential risks, including:

If we consummate any future acquisitions, our capitalization and results of operations may change significantly, and you will not have the opportunity to evaluate the economic, financial and other relevant information that we will consider in determining the application of our future funds and other resources. In addition, if we issue additional units in connection with future growth, your interest in us will be diluted, and distributions to you may be reduced.

We are subject to significant operating hazards and uninsured risks, one or more of which may create significant liabilities for us.

The construction and operation of the Sabine Pass LNG receiving terminal will be subject to the inherent risks often associated with this type of operation, including explosions, pollution, release of toxic substances, fires, hurricanes and adverse weather conditions and other hazards, each of which could result in a significant delay in the timing of commencement of operations and/or in damage to or destruction of the facility or damage to persons and property. In addition, operations at the Sabine Pass LNG receiving terminal and the facilities and tankers of third parties on which our operations are dependent face possible risks associated with acts of aggression or terrorism.

We do not, nor do we intend to, maintain insurance against some of these risks and losses. See “Business—Insurance.” We may not be able to maintain desired or required insurance in the future at rates that we consider reasonable. The occurrence of a significant event not fully insured or indemnified against could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, financial condition and prospects.

35

Table of Contents

Index to Financial Statements

Existing and future U.S. governmental regulation could result in increased compliance costs or additional operating costs and restrictions.

Our business is and will be subject to extensive federal, state and local laws and regulations that regulate the discharge of natural gas, hazardous substances, materials and other compounds into the environment or otherwise relate to the protection of the environment. Many of these laws and regulations, such as the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act, the Clean Air Act, the Oil Pollution Act and the Clean Water Act, and analogous state laws and regulations, restrict or prohibit the types, quantities and concentration of substances that can be released into the environment in connection with the construction and operation of the Sabine Pass LNG receiving terminal. Releases in violation of these regulations can lead to substantial liabilities for non-compliance or for pollution or releases of hazardous substances, materials or compounds or otherwise require additional costs or changes in operations that could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, financial condition and prospects. Failure to comply with these laws and regulations may also result in substantial civil and criminal fines and penalties.

Existing environmental laws and regulations may be revised or reinterpreted or new laws and regulations may be adopted or become applicable to us. For example, the adoption of frequently proposed legislation implementing a carbon tax on energy sources that emit carbon dioxide into the atmosphere may have a material adverse effect on the ability of our customers, particularly Cheniere Marketing: (i) to import LNG, if imposed on them as importers of potential emission sources, or (ii) to sell regasified LNG, if imposed on them or their customers as natural gas suppliers or consumers. In addition, as Sabine Pass LNG consumes retainage gas at the Sabine Pass LNG receiving terminal, this carbon tax may also be imposed on Sabine Pass LNG directly. Other future legislation and regulations, such as those relating to the transportation and security of LNG imported to the Sabine Pass LNG receiving terminal through the Sabine Pass Channel, could cause additional expenditures, restrictions and delays in our business and to our planned construction, the extent of which cannot be predicted and which may require us to limit substantially, delay or cease operations in some circumstances. Revised, reinterpreted or additional laws and regulations that result in increased compliance costs or additional operating costs and restrictions could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, financial condition and prospects.

Our lack of diversification could have an adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.

All of our revenue is derived from payments under TUAs relating to one asset, the Sabine Pass LNG receiving terminal. Due to our lack of asset and geographic diversification, an adverse development at the Sabine Pass LNG receiving terminal or in the LNG industry would have a significantly greater impact on our financial condition and results of operations than if we maintained more diverse assets and operating areas.

Terrorist attacks or military campaigns may adversely impact our business.

A terrorist incident involving an LNG facility or LNG carrier may result in delays in, or cancellation of, construction of new LNG facilities, including the Sabine Pass LNG receiving terminal, which would increase our costs and decrease our cash flows and could delay commencement of commercial operations. A terrorist incident may also result in temporary or permanent closure of existing LNG facilities, which, after commencement of commercial operations at the Sabine Pass LNG receiving terminal, could increase our costs and decrease our cash flows, depending on the duration of the closure. Operations at the Sabine Pass LNG receiving terminal could also become subject to increased governmental scrutiny that may result in additional security measures at a significant incremental cost to us. In addition, the threat of terrorism and the impact of military campaigns may lead to continued volatility in prices for natural gas that could adversely affect our customers, particularly Cheniere Marketing, including their ability to satisfy their obligations to us under their TUAs.

36

Table of Contents

Index to Financial Statements

Risks Relating to an Investment in Us and Our Common Units

Our general partner and its affiliates have conflicts of interest and limited fiduciary duties, which may permit them to favor their own interests to the detriment of us and our unitholders.

Following this offering, Cheniere will control our general partner, which has sole responsibility for conducting our business and managing our operations. Some of our general partner’s directors are also directors of Cheniere, and certain of our general partner’s officers are officers of Cheniere. Therefore, conflicts of interest may arise between Cheniere and its affiliates, including our general partner, on the one hand, and us and our unitholders, on the other hand. In resolving these conflicts, our general partner may favor its own interests and the interests of its affiliates over the interests of us and our unitholders. These conflicts include, among others, the following situations:

37

Table of Contents

Index to Financial Statements

We expect that there will be additional agreements or arrangements with Cheniere and its affiliates, including future interconnection, natural gas balancing and storage agreements with one or more Cheniere- affiliated natural gas pipelines as well as other agreements and arrangements that cannot now be anticipated. In those circumstances where additional contracts with Cheniere and its affiliates may be necessary or desirable, additional conflicts of interest will be involved.

Cheniere is not restricted from competing with us and is free to develop, operate and dispose of, and is currently developing, LNG receiving terminals, pipelines and other assets without any obligation to offer us the opportunity to develop or acquire those assets.

Cheniere and its affiliates are not prohibited from owning assets or engaging in businesses that compete directly or indirectly with us. Cheniere may acquire, construct or dispose of its planned Corpus Christi or Creole Trail LNG receiving terminals, its planned pipelines or any other assets without any obligation to offer us the opportunity to purchase or construct any of those assets. In addition, under our partnership agreement, the doctrine of corporate opportunity, or any analogous doctrine, will not apply to Cheniere and its affiliates. As a result, neither Cheniere nor any of its affiliates will have any obligation to present new business opportunities to us, and they may take advantage of such opportunities themselves. Cheniere also has significantly greater resources and experience than we have, which may make it more difficult for us to compete with Cheniere and its affiliates with respect to commercial activities or acquisition candidates.

Our partnership agreement limits our general partner’s fiduciary duties to unitholders and restricts the remedies available to unitholders for actions taken by our general partner that might otherwise constitute breaches of fiduciary duty.

Our partnership agreement contains provisions that reduce the standards to which our general partner would otherwise be held by state fiduciary duty law. For example, our partnership agreement:

38

Table of Contents

Index to Financial Statements

By purchasing a common unit, a unitholder will become bound by the provisions of our partnership agreement, including the provisions described above. Please read “Description of the Common Units—Transfer of Common Units.”

Holders of our common units have limited voting rights and are not entitled to elect our general partner or its directors, which could reduce the price at which the common units trade.

Unlike the holders of common stock in a corporation, unitholders have only limited voting rights on matters affecting our business and, therefore, limited ability to influence management’s decisions regarding our business. Unitholders will have no right to elect our general partner or its board of directors on an annual or other continuing basis. The board of directors of our general partner is chosen entirely by Cheniere Holdings, an indirect wholly-owned subsidiary of Cheniere. As a result, the price at which the common units will trade could be diminished because of the absence or reduction of a control premium in the trading price.

Even if unitholders are dissatisfied, they cannot initially remove our general partner without its consent.

If our unitholders will be unable initially to remove our general partner. Our unitholders will be unable to remove our general partner without the consent of Cheniere Holdings because Cheniere Holdings will own a sufficient number of common and subordinated units upon completion of this offering to be able to prevent removal of our general partner. The vote of the holders of at least 66 ²/3% of all outstanding common and subordinated units (including any units owned by our general partner and its affiliates) voting together as a single class is required to remove our general partner. Following the closing of this offering, Cheniere Holdings will own approximately 92.3% of our common and subordinated units (approximately 91.1% if the underwriters exercise their option to purchase additional common units in full). In addition, if our general partner is removed without cause during the subordination period and units held by our general partner and its affiliates are not voted in favor of that removal, all remaining subordinated units will automatically be converted into common units and any existing arrearages on the common units will be extinguished. A removal of our general partner under these circumstances would adversely affect the common units by prematurely eliminating their distribution and liquidation preference over the subordinated units, which would otherwise have continued until we had met certain distribution and performance tests.

Cause is narrowly defined in our partnership agreement to mean that a court of competent jurisdiction has entered a final, non-appealable judgment finding our general partner liable for actual fraud or willful misconduct in its capacity as our general partner. Cause does not include most cases of poor management of the business, so the removal of the general partner because of the unitholder’s dissatisfaction with our general partner’s performance in managing our partnership will most likely result in the termination of the subordination period and conversion of all subordinated units to common units.

Control of our general partner may be transferred to a third party without unitholder consent.

Our general partner may transfer its general partner interest to a third party in a merger or in a sale of all or substantially all of its assets without the consent of the unitholders. Furthermore, our partnership agreement does not restrict the ability of the owners of our general partner from transferring all or a portion of their respective ownership interest in our general partner to a third party. The new owners of our general partner would then be in a position to replace the board of directors and officers of our general partner with its own choices and thereby influence the decisions taken by the board of directors and officers.

We will incur significant costs as a result of being a publicly traded company.

We have no history operating as a publicly traded company. As a publicly traded company, we will incur significant legal, accounting and other expenses that we would not incur as a private company. In addition, the

39

Table of Contents

Index to Financial Statements

Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, as well as rules subsequently implemented by the SEC and the American Stock Exchange, have required changes in corporate governance practices of publicly traded companies. We expect these rules and regulations to increase our legal and financial compliance costs and to make activities more time-consuming and costly. For example, as a result of becoming a publicly traded company, we are required to have at least three independent directors, create additional board committees and adopt policies regarding internal controls and disclosure controls and procedures, including the preparation of reports on internal controls over financial reporting. In addition, we will incur additional costs associated with our publicly traded company reporting requirements. We also expect these new rules and regulations to make it more difficult and more expensive for our general partner to obtain director and officer liability insurance, and it may be required to accept reduced policy limits and coverage or incur substantially higher costs to obtain the same or similar coverage. As a result, it may be more difficult for our general partner to attract and retain qualified persons to serve on its board of directors or as executive officers.

Our general partner has a limited call right that may require you to sell your common units at an undesirable time or price.

At the completion of this offering, and assuming no exercise of the underwriters’ option to purchase additional units, an affiliate of our general partner will own 52.7% of our total common units. If the subordinated units convert into common units, an affiliate of our general partner will own approximately 92.3% of the common units (approximately 91.1% if the underwriters exercise their option to purchase additional common units in full). If at any time more than 80% of our outstanding common units are owned by our general partner and its affiliates, our general partner will have the right, but not the obligation, which it may assign to any of its affiliates or to us, to acquire all, but not less than all, of our common units held by unaffiliated persons at a price not less than their then-current market price, as defined in our partnership agreement. As a result, you may be required to sell your common units at an undesirable time or price and may not receive any return on your investment. You may also incur a tax liability upon a sale of your common units. Our general partner is not obligated to obtain a fairness opinion regarding the value of the common units to be repurchased by it upon exercise of the limited call right. There is no restriction in our partnership agreement that prevents our general partner from issuing additional common units or other equity securities and exercising its call right. If our general partner exercised its limited call right, the effect would be to take us private and, if the common units were subsequently deregistered, we would no longer be subject to the reporting requirements of the Exchange Act. For additional information about the limited call right, please read “The Partnership Agreement—Limited Call Right.”

Our partnership agreement restricts the voting rights of unitholders (other than our general partner and its affiliates) owning 20% or more of any class of our units.

Our partnership agreement restricts unitholders’ voting rights by providing that any units held by a person that owns 20% or more of any class of units then outstanding, other than our general partner and its affiliates, their transferees and persons who acquired such units with the prior approval of the board of directors of our general partner, cannot vote on any matter. The partnership agreement also contains provisions limiting the ability of unitholders to call meetings or to acquire information about our operations, as well as other provisions limiting the unitholders’ ability to influence the manner or direction of management.

Our partnership agreement prohibits a unitholder (other than our general partner and its affiliates) who acquires 15% or more of our limited partner units without the approval of our general partner from engaging in a business combination with us for three years unless certain approvals are obtained. This provision could discourage a change of control that our unitholders may favor, which could negatively affect the price of our common units.

Our partnership agreement effectively adopts Section 203 of the Delaware General Corporation Law, or the DGCL. Section 203 of the DGCL as it applies to us prevents an interested unitholder, defined as a person (other

40

Table of Contents

Index to Financial Statements

than our general partner and its affiliates) who owns 15% or more of our outstanding limited partner units, from engaging in business combinations with us for three years following the time such person becomes an interested unitholder unless certain approvals are obtained. Section 203 broadly defines “business combination” to encompass a wide variety of transactions with or caused by an interested unitholder, including mergers, asset sales and other transactions in which the interested unitholder receives a benefit on other than a pro rata basis with other unitholders. This provision of our partnership agreement could have an anti-takeover effect with respect to transactions not approved in advance by our general partner, including discouraging takeover attempts that might result in a premium over the market price for our common units.

You will experience immediate and substantial dilution of $20.95 per common unit.

The assumed initial public offering price of $20.00 per common unit exceeds the pro forma net tangible book value of $(0.95) per common unit as of December 31, 2006. You will incur immediate and substantial dilution of $20.95 per common unit. This dilution results primarily because the assets contributed by our general partner and its affiliates are recorded at their historical cost, and not their fair value, in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, or GAAP. Please read “Dilution.”

You may not have limited liability if a court finds that unitholder action constitutes control of our business.

A general partner of a partnership generally has unlimited liability for the obligations of the partnership, except for contractual obligations of the partnership that are expressly made without recourse to the general partner. We are organized under Delaware law, and we conduct business in other states. As a limited partner in a partnership organized under Delaware law, you could be held liable for our obligations to the same extent as a general partner if a court determined that the right or the exercise of the right by our unitholders as a group to remove or replace our general partner, to approve some amendments to the partnership agreement or to take other action under our partnership agreement constituted participation in the “control” of our business. In addition, limitations on the liability of holders of limited partner interests for the obligations of a limited partnership have not been clearly established in many jurisdictions. Please read “The Partnership Agreement—Limited Liability.”

You may have liability to repay distributions wrongfully made.

Under certain circumstances, our unitholders may have to repay amounts wrongfully distributed to them. Under Section 17-607 of the Delaware Revised Uniform Limited Partnership Act, we may not make a distribution to our unitholders if the distribution would cause our liabilities to exceed the fair value of our assets. Delaware law provides that, for a period of three years from the date of the impermissible distribution, partners who received such a distribution and who knew at the time of the distribution that it violated Delaware law will be liable to the partnership for the distribution amount. Liabilities to partners on account of their partner interests and liabilities that are non-recourse to the partnership are not counted for purposes of determining whether a distribution is permitted.

We may issue additional units without your approval, which would dilute your ownership interest.

At any time during the subordination period, with the approval of the conflicts committee of the board of directors of our general partner, we may issue an unlimited number of limited partner interests of any type without the approval of our unitholders. After the subordination period, we may issue an unlimited number of limited partner interests of any type without limitation of any kind. The issuance by us of additional common units or other equity securities of equal or senior rank will have the following effects:

41

Table of Contents

Index to Financial Statements

There is no existing market for our common units, and a trading market that will provide you with adequate liquidity may not develop.

Prior to this offering, there has been no public market for the common units, and our common units have not previously traded on any exchange or market. After this offering, there will be only 12,500,000 publicly traded common units, assuming no exercise of the underwriters’ option to purchase additional common units. We do not know the extent to which investor interest will lead to the development of a trading market or how liquid that market might be. Unitholders may not be able to resell their common units at or above the initial public offering price. In addition, the lack of liquidity may result in wide bid-ask spreads, contribute to significant fluctuations in the market price of the common units and limit the number of investors who are able to buy the common units. We cannot assure you as to:

The price of our common units may fluctuate significantly, and you could lose all or part of your investment.

The initial public offering price for our common units will be determined by negotiations between us and the representatives of the underwriters and may not be indicative of the market price of our common units that will prevail in the trading market. The market price of our common units may decline below the initial public offering price. The market price of our common units may also be influenced by many factors, some of which are beyond our control, including:

Affiliates of our general partner may sell common units, which sales could have an adverse impact on the trading price of the common units.

Sales by us or any of our existing unitholders, including Cheniere Holdings, of a substantial number of our common units following this offering, or the perception that such sales might occur, could have a material adverse effect on the price of our common units or could impair our ability to obtain capital through an offering

42

Table of Contents

Index to Financial Statements

of equity securities. Following the closing of this offering, Cheniere Holdings will own approximately 13,916,357 common units and 135,383,831 subordinated units. All of the subordinated units will convert into common units at the end of the subordination period and may convert earlier. The sale of these units could have an adverse impact on the price of the common units or on any trading market that may develop.

Risks Relating to Tax Matters

Our tax treatment depends on our status as a partnership for federal income tax purposes, as well as our not being subject to a material amount of additional entity level taxation by individual states. If the IRS were to treat us as a corporation or if we were to become subject to a material amount of additional entity level taxation for state tax purposes, then our cash available for distribution to you would be substantially reduced.

The anticipated after-tax economic benefit of an investment in our common units depends largely on our being treated as a partnership for federal income tax purposes. We have not requested, and do not plan to request, a ruling from the IRS on this matter.

If we were treated as a corporation for federal income tax purposes, we would pay federal income tax on our taxable income at the corporate tax rate, which is currently a maximum of 35%, and we likely would pay state taxes as well. Distributions to you would generally be taxed again as corporate distributions, and no income, gains, losses or deductions would flow through to you. Because a tax would be imposed upon us as a corporation, the cash available for distributions to you would be substantially reduced. Therefore, treatment of us as a corporation would result in a material reduction in the anticipated cash flow and after-tax return to you, likely causing a substantial reduction in the value of our common units.

Current law may change, causing us to be treated as a corporation for federal income tax purposes or otherwise subjecting us to a material amount of entity level taxation for federal, state or local income tax purposes. In addition, several states are evaluating ways to subject partnerships to entity level taxation through the imposition of state income, franchise or other forms of taxation. For example, we will be subject to a new entity level tax on the portion of our revenue generated in Texas beginning for tax reports due on or after January 1, 2008. Specifically, the Texas margin tax will be imposed at a maximum effective rate of 0.7% of our gross income apportioned to Texas. Imposition of such tax on us by the State of Texas, or any other state, will reduce the cash available for distribution to you.

A successful IRS contest of the federal income tax positions that we take may adversely impact the market for our common units, and the costs of any contests will be borne by our unitholders and our general partner.

The IRS may adopt positions that differ from the positions that we take, even positions taken with advice of counsel. It may be necessary to resort to administrative or court proceedings to sustain some or all of the positions that we take. A court may not agree with some or all of the positions that we take. Any contest with the IRS may materially and adversely impact the market for our common units. In addition, the costs of any contest with the IRS, principally legal, accounting and related fees, will be borne indirectly by our unitholders and our general partner.

You may be required to pay taxes on your share of our taxable income even if you do not receive any cash distributions from us.